Skydiving In St Louis Area
The international volunteer tourism experience in South Africa: An investigation into the impact on the tourist.
Conference PaperAbstract This paper is extracted from an ongoing study on the effect of engaging in international volunteer work as a tourist in South Africa, through a Cape Town based provider, AVIVA SA. Data was collected from fifty volunteer tourists using a web-based personality inventory prior to and post the volunteer vacation. Subsequent personality changes, determined by measuring fifteen core traits, were compared with a similar sized control group. Thereafter personal interviews were conducted to understand the experience, causes for the resulting changes and their effect on the volunteer tourists. The findings point to significant changes in six traits, which were manifested in the volunteers day-to-day life; they add to a growing body of literature on volunteer tourism, and by highlighting the benefits of volunteer tourism, may have marketing implications. Key words: Volunteer tourism, traits, personal change, South Africa.
Conference Paper for Global Sustainable International Conference, 15 - 19 November 2010, NELSPRUIT - MBOMBELA - SOUTH AFRICA Presenter: Zo Alexander (1st author) affiliated to Buckinghamshire New University, United Kingdom (Faculty of Design, Media and Management) and supervised by Dr Ali Bakir (2nd author). Introduction This paper is extracted from an ongoing study on the effect of engaging in international volunteer work as a tourist in South Africa. Volunteer tourism is seen to provide a form of travel in which both the volunteer and the host communities gain from the experience (Raymond and Hall, 2008). Understanding the tourist experience is an essential prerequisite for successful destination marketing (Yoon and Uysal, 2005); and understanding the type of specific benefits gained by visitors is an important dimension of sustainable product development (Wearing, 2001). Literature review
The literature on the impact of volunteer tourism on the volunteer suggests that volunteer tourism promotes personal development and cross-cultural understanding. For example, Wearing (2001) found that interactions with other volunteers and the community helped develop the volunteers' confidence, and increased their awareness of other people and environments. Similarly, Broad (2003) observed some personal change in the volunteers in terms of increased knowledge, confidence and skills, and changes in the way they viewed their lives and the world. More recently, Harlow and Pomfret (2007) identified a number of similar themes in the way individuals perceive themselves in relation to the world around them. Zahra and McIntosh (2007) found that the volunteers' experiences did not only leave a lasting impression but also significantly altered their attitudes, values and behaviour. Lepp (2008) also recorded changes in the volunteers, including being able to put things in perspective when they go wrong; plotting a more meaningful course in life; and new goals. Lepp additionally identified that it was the experience of interacting with locals that enabled the volunteers to discover these things about themselves. Recently, Clemmons and McGehee (2008) identified geographic destination; interaction type; intensity of experience; motivation; expectation; willingness/personal effort; project preference; and previous life experience, as eight primary transformative elements. Daldeniz (2009) and Tomazos and Butler (2008) suggest that the volunteering experience is likely to vary greatly from individual to individual. Not all researchers, however, concur on the transformative potential of volunteer tourism; Gudykunst (1998), for example, labels gap yearers' as fluent fools' who have the language of understanding but possess little actual understanding. Likewise Simpson (2004) argues that gap year providers' claims for the educative benefits of overseas volunteering are based on flawed assumptions. The literature supports the potential of volunteer tourism as an agent for change (McGehee and Santos, 2005). More specifically, Wearing (2001) proposed that social interaction between participants on a particular project site with representatives of the community, [volunteer] group and natural environment results in an exchange of influence' (p.124). This influence, he suggests, can change the tourist because the tourist is an active, thinking unit who is able to construct meaning from the milieu in which he or she lives. Concurring, McGehee (2002) and McGehee and Santos (2005) suggest that as a consequence of the social networks established during an expedition, volunteers can be inspired to become socially active at home. However, some of these volunteers who felt strongly that the volunteer experience changed them, had difficulty articulating the specific benefits; thus undermining the usefulness of some data collection methods.
Furthermore, the majority of research investigating the impact of volunteer tourism was carried out on the volunteers either during the experience (Broad, 2003; Harlow and Pomfret, 2007; Sin, 2009) or many years afterwards as with Brown (2005) and Zahra and McIntosh (2007). Dex (1991) says that the error of recall is likely to be greater the further back in history the respondent is required to remember. Also, much of the research (Broad, 2003; Harlow and Pomfret, 2007; Lepp, 2008; Lough, Moore McBride and Sherraden, 2009; Zahra and McIntosh, 2007; Sin, 2009; Wearing, 2001) does not incorporate a pre-analysis of the individual's attitudes and behaviours before the trip to establish a baseline, nor do they include a control group to provide comparison data against which the effects of volunteer tourism can be judged. With regard to the latter, Hill, Russell and Brewis (2009) posit that although participants themselves may attribute skills development directly to the volunteer experience, it is harder to establish such causal links. Some exceptions include Van Willigen (2000), who used a control group but her research was confined to domestic volunteering. This study proposes to address these issues by testing' people before they leave for their trip (to provide a baseline) and again two weeks to one month after the volunteers return home. Furthermore, there will be a sample of non-volunteers (a control group) carrying on with their day-to-day lives who will be measured over a similar time period to establish causal links. Also, in order to gain insight into the volunteers' experience and how changes are translated into their everyday lives at home, structured personal interviews with some volunteers were undertaken, complimenting the quantitative data and making the findings more usable to a wider audience (Denzin, 1989; Fielding and Fielding, 1986; Flick, 1992; Hedge, Borman and Birkeland, 2001). Study MethodThe study adopts a quantitative approach using a personality inventory to collect data. This also drives the use of a structured qualitative method, the interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) of interviews. The mixed-method design increases the validity of the data, creating a more complete picture of reality (Feyeraband, 1975). As such, the methodological approach follows Morse's (1991) sequential explanatory design', where data from one method (quantitative personality inventory) is collected and analysed before before moving on to the next method (IPA of interviews). Personality tests focus on the quantitative measurements of traits, or identifiable characteristics that define a person (Ong and Van Dulmen, 2007; Solomon, 1996). These tests involve asking individuals who are asked to rate their own actions or feelings in set situations, thus providing a convenient snapshot of a person's position at a given moment in time (Albery, Chandler, Field, Jones, Messer, Moore and Sterling, 2004). The IPIP-NEO Personality Inventory was used because: it covers all the major dimensions of personality comprehensively, there is no cost for using it, and it is very stable over long periods of time (Johnson, 2007). The IPIP-NEO is also simple and easy to use, administer and score. Using this tool, fifteen traits[1] were measured. It is acknowledged that there are problems with personality inventories in that they only capture specific types of data; in this case it only measures traits, ignoring all those other areas subject to change. The next stage in the research design involved understanding the meaning of those changes for the individuals concerned. As the sampling unit was dispersed around the world, a web-based option, in the form of structured email interviews, appeared to be the most practical method to capture data. The interview scripts were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA); a relatively recent qualitative technique developed specifically for psychology studies. The aim of the IPA is to understand what volunteers think about their volunteer tourism experiences (Smith and Osborn, 2004), what may have triggered their changes and the effects of those changes in their daily lives. It was the preferred method for this study because of its suitability where one is concerned to understand something about process and change (Higginson and Mansell, 2008). It is a structured step-by-step process that involves identifying emerging themes from the data (Meek, 2007; Reid, Flowers and Larkin, 2005), and discovering connections between data to establish categories and eventually master categories. In this respect it is similar to grounded theory; however, the aim of grounded theory is to develop theory whereas IPA is concerned with developing an understanding of individuals' experiences (Shaw, 2001).
Two samples were used, volunteer tourists and control group. In determining the sample size, the challenge was establishing how many responses were required to provide results that could be generalised to AVIVA volunteer tourists. 50 participants were advised[2], representing 20% of AVIVA'S population of approximately 250 volunteers in 2009-2010. For the control group's size, it was not necessary to match one to one', and as long as the control group has a similar socioeconomic range, roughly half (30) the number of volunteer tourists was deemed sufficient. The 50 volunteer tourists' sample consisted of people who put themselves forward to take part in the research (Albery et al, 2004). This sample was made up of 9 men and 41 women, there were thirty-six 16-29 year old peoples and fourteen 30+. This profile is similar to that found in most volunteer tourism research as well as recent industry figures (see Gecko, Bradt Travel Guides and Lasso Communications, 2009; Harlow and Pomfret, 2007; Lepp, 2008; Lough et al, 2009, McGehee, 2002, 2005; McIntosh and Zahra, 2007; Sin, 2009; Wearing, 2001; Zahra, 2006). The participants spent an average of 4100 (R51000), stayed an average 9 weeks, and participated in volunteering 60% of their holiday time. The weekends were generally spent relaxing and doing tourism activities such as shark-diving, clubbing, site-seeing and shopping. The majority of volunteers (60%) participated in children and community projects, 36% in wildlife and conservation projects, and 4% in both. The greatest percentage of the sample were from United Kingdom (42%), followed by USA (20%), Europe (20%), Australia and New Zealand (12%), Canada (4%), and Southern Africa (2%). All volunteers booked their international volunteering trip through the AVIVA organisation; the latter provided the link between the volunteer tourists and the data collection web-site (www.bucksresearch.org.uk) via the on-line booking confirmation. The control group of 30 people were roughly matched to the volunteers on age, gender and socio-economic variables. There were 7 men and 23 women, and twenty-one 16-29 years old and nine 30+. As in the volunteer tourists, the largest occupational groups were students, professionals, and managers. The control group were selected through opportunity sampling, where people were willing to take part in the research when asked rather than volunteering (Albery et al, 2004). The control group consisted of people who did not undertake volunteer tourism; their selection involved some snowballing.
The personality inventory was set up on the web. The web-site www.bucksresearch.org.uk was specially developed for the purpose of collecting data for this research. It was designed to be simple but functional and compliant with the Data Protection Act of 1998. The web-site was formally user-tested prior to being launched in the public domain. Thereafter, a pilot study was conducted on the web-site using the first ten control group members to test out the data collection process and volume test the technical aspects of the web-site. The pre-measurement personality inventory was completed at the time of booking the trip, and the post-measurement personality inventory was requested two weeks after the volunteer tourist returned home. This gave the volunteer tourist sufficient time to settle back in, yet capture the experience whilst it was still fresh in their minds. For the control group members, the post-measurement personality inventory was requested six months after the pre-measurement inventory; based on the average length of stay of a volunteer with AVIVA and the average length of time between booking and leaving. The analysis of the data involved scoring and comparing the pre-measurement personality inventory to the post-measurement personality inventory. For each trait, two-tailed t-tests for dependent (paired off) samples were carried out to find out whether there were significant differences between the pre inventory and post inventory group results. The analysis additionally involved establishing whether there were differences, by trait, between the changes in the volunteer tourist group and the changes in the control group identified from the t-test. Clegg (1982) suggests using the standard deviation calculated for each group's scores, by trait, so that they could be compared to the other group. Then, the variance-ratio was applied to statistically determine whether there was a significant difference between them. Following the statistical analysis, the participants were asked to describe the experiences which they thought might have led to the significant changes and what they are doing differently now as a result. The email discussion and responses were analysed using IPA and followed Smith and Osborn's (2004) recommendations beginning with the first script and searching for themes and respective categories before proceeding to the next script. Once all the scripts were thus coded, the search for patterns followed to establish master categories for the group as a whole. These categories were then described in detail supported by extracts taken from the interviews. Results and findingsThe statistical results presented in the tables below were obtained from fifty volunteer tourists and thirty control group members, using two-tailed t-tests for dependent samples.
Table 1 shows initially eight personality traits (out of fifteen) significantly changed amongst the volunteer group as a whole after their international volunteering experience. Just one personality trait (assertiveness) significantly changed (increased) amongst the control group as a whole, over a similar period of time (six months).
| Table 1. The impact of volunteer tourism on personality traits | ||||||
| Volunteers | Pre Trip score | Post Trip score | Change (Impact) | T-Stat | Probability (% of time one would expect these results) | Significant |
| Trait |
|
|
|
| df (49) |
|
| Anxiety | 11.46 | 9.38 | Decrease | 3.403 | 0.003 (99.7%) | Yes |
| Trust | 13.92 | 15.08 | Increase | 2.545 | 0.0082 (99.18%) | Yes |
| Self-Efficacy | 15.38 | 16.12 | Increase | 1.55 | 0.0633 (93.67%) | No |
| Artistic Interests | 14.12 | 14.88 | Increase | 1.455 | 0.0726 (92.74%) | No |
| Depression | 9.52 | 7.84 | Decrease | 3.429 | 0.0005 (99.95%) | Yes |
| Assertiveness | 13.46 | 14.90 | Increase | 2.555 | 0.0026 (99.74%) | Yes |
| Emotionality | 15.26 | 16.16 | Increase | 2.131 | 0.0083 (99.17%) | Yes |
| Altruism | 17.02 | 17.48 | Increase | 1.043 | 0.2591 (74.09%) | No |
| Dutifulness | 16.14 | 16.52 | Increase | 1.803 | 0.2553 (74.47%) | No |
| Activity Level | 13.20 | 13.94 | Increase | 1.755 | 0.0351 (96.49%) | Yes |
| Adventurousness | 13.32 | 14.52 | Increase | 2.613 | 0.0035 (99.65%) | Yes |
| Intellect | 13.88 | 14.40 | Increase | 1.122 | 0.3371 (66.29%) | No |
| Vulnerability | 10.18 | 8.82 | Decrease | 3.671 | 0.0021 (99.79%) | Yes |
| Liberalism | 12.58 | 12.76 | Increase | 0.737 | 0.6729 (32.71%) | No |
| Cautiousness | 13.56 | 13.32 | Decrease | 0.379 | 0.7504 (24.96%) | No |
Table 2 compares the changes in the personality traits of the volunteer group to the changes in the personality traits of the control group using standard deviation and the variance. The significant differences between the two groups are apparent in initially eleven personality traits. However, comparing the significant changes in the volunteer tourists (Table 1) to the significant differences between the volunteer tourists and the control groups (Table 2), only six personality traits remain significant, they are: anxiety, depression, assertiveness, emotionality, adventurousness, and vulnerability. With regard to the other traits, either the differences between the two groups were not significant or there were no significant differences between the pre and post inventory results of the volunteer tourists.
| Table 2. The difference between the control and volunteer tourist group, by trait | ||||||
| Trait | Group | Std Deviation | Variance | Variance Ratio | Probability & FDIST | Significant |
|
|
|
|
| F STAT | df1=49; df2=29 |
|
| Anxiety | Control | 2.48 | 6.17 |
| 99.87% | Yes |
| Anxiety | Volunteer | 4.27 | 18.2 | 2.95 | 0.0013 |
|
| Trust | Control | 2.39 | 5.73 |
| 94.57% | No |
| Trust | Volunteer | 3.17 | 10.04 | 1.75 | 0.0543 |
|
| Self-Efficacy | Control | 1.77 | 3.13 |
| 99.57% | Yes |
| Self-Efficacy | Volunteer | 2.82 | 7.98 | 2.55 | 0.0043 |
|
| Artistic Interests | Control | 2.09 | 4.37 |
| 90.90% | No |
| Artistic Interests | Volunteer | 2.64 | 6.96 | 1.59 | 0.0910 |
|
| Depression | Control | 1.96 | 3.83 |
| 99.96% | Yes |
| Depression | Volunteer | 3.57 | 12.76 | 3.33 | 0.0004 |
|
| Assertiveness | Control | 2.18 | 4.77 |
| 99.56% | Yes |
| Assertiveness | Volunteer | 3.48 | 12.12 | 2.54 | 0.0044 |
|
| Emotionality | Control | 1.75 | 3.07 |
| 97.36% | Yes |
| Emotionality | Volunteer | 2.46 | 6.06 | 1.97 | 0.0264 |
|
| Altruism | Control | 1.67 | 2.8 |
| 97.28% | Yes |
| Altruism | Volunteer | 2.35 | 5.5 | 1.96 | 0.0272 |
|
| Dutifulness | Control | 1.47 | 2.17 |
| 99.00% | Yes |
| Dutifulness | Volunteer | 2.22 | 4.94 | 2.28 | 0.0100 |
|
| Activity Level | Control | 2.06 | 4.23 |
| 86.95% | No |
| Activity Level | Volunteer | 2.5 | 6.26 | 1.48 | 0.1305 |
|
| Adventurousness | Control | 1.9 | 3.6 |
| 99.19% | Yes |
| Adventurousness | Volunteer | 2.91 | 8.44 | 2.34 | 0.0081 |
|
| Intellect | Control | 3.01 | 9.03 |
| 66.38% | No |
| Intellect | Volunteer | 2.79 | 7.76 | 1.16 | 0.3362 |
|
| Vulnerability | Control | 1.91 | 3.67 |
| 99.83% | Yes |
| Vulnerability | Volunteer | 3.24 | 10.48 | 2.86 | 0.0017 |
|
| Liberalism | Control | 1.35 | 1.83 |
| 99.88% | Yes |
| Liberalism | Volunteer | 2.33 | 5.42 | 2.96 | 0.0012 |
|
| Cautiousness | Control | 2.62 | 6.87 |
| 95.84% | Yes |
| Cautiousness | Volunteer | 3.55 | 12.6 | 1.83 | 0.0416 |
|
The interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was employed to interpret data from interviewing 30 volunteers; all completed both personality inventories.
The experience categories (Table 3) that emerged from the responses were: action', responsibility', participation', immersion', interaction', and expectations/satisfaction levels'. The impacts categories (Table 4) that arose from the responses were: changes around people's personal circumstances', behaviour', emotions', confidence', values', knowledge or skills', and attitudes'.
| Table 3. Master experience categories identified from interviewing volunteer tourists | ||
| Master category | Definition | Frequency |
| Action | Doing something | 6 |
| Involvement | To become connected or associated with | 6 |
| Responsibility | looking after oneself, others or a task | 10 |
| Participation | Observation whilst sharing in activities | 13 |
| Immersion | To engross oneself and get absorbed in | 4 |
| Interaction | To have an effect on each other/exchange | 3 |
| Expectations/Satisfaction levels | What one hopes for/fulfilment of that hope | 1 |
| Table 4. Master impact/change categories identified from interviewing volunteer tourists
| ||
| Master category | Definition | Frequency |
| Personal circumstances | Conditions that influence a person | 2 |
| Behaviour | Acting in a particular way as a result of biological functions, perceptions, unconscious forces, attitudes, beliefs & feelings | 6 |
| Emotions | Feelings based on our appraisal of the situation and the possible actions we might take in relation to it | 4 |
| Confidence | Belief in one's personal worth and likelihood of succeeding | 8 |
| Values | Ideas about what people should do | 3 |
| Attitudes | Our response tendency toward a person, object or situation | 12 |
| Knowledge and skills | Learning | 3 |
Analysis Under each trait, significant changes in the trait are discussed below, drawing on the statistical results and themes extracted from the interviewed respondents. Anxiety - Anxiety levels significantly decreased as a result of the international volunteering experience; the volunteer tourists worry less about things, are calm and generally less fearful; these findings support Van Willigen (2000). Interviewed respondents threw some light on the decreased anxiety levels resulting from the volunteering experience: "I was always busy (with God only knows what) and now I take the time to breathe and relax, and just hang out and enjoy life a little more" (volunteer 22). The behavioural change' in this volunteer's life, she believes, was brought about by taking responsibility': "I Worked with children who look up to you and rely on you each and every day, they always had unconditional love; they judge you for who you are on the inside and not what you have on the outside". She also spoke of attitude changes': "It gave me a new outlook on life. It made me realise that I shouldn't sweat the small stuff; now I realise that there is so much more to life than that". These changes were also a result of a participatory experience': "I found goodness in people that I was beginning to think doesn't exist anymore." An emotion change' also emerged: "I have so much going on in my head at the present time; it was the most thought provoking experience of my life" (volunteer 23). This participant also experienced a value change': "It made me think of what I have and do I really need it". Both these changes, for this volunteer, were brought about by a participatory experience': "not [being able to] get over how happy the children were although they had nothing material". Volunteer 24 expressed similar views: "I have seen kids with not enough food, nothing to look forward to and no toys and they are still the happiest kids in the world! All they want is to be held"; this affected her attitude': "It changed my whole perspective; things that seemed important are no longer".
Changes in confidence' also emerged as a theme: "I feel I could deal with other situations now, which take me outside my comfort zone" (volunteer 4); "I am not quite as nervous now in new situations" (volunteer 21); and "I have greater confidence" (volunteer 9). Confidence is demonstrated in the volunteers' taking responsibility': "I met situations that took me outside my comfort zone" (volunteer 4), and "I made the trip on my own and met new people. I arranged a lot of stuff myself during my trip and found solutions to problems" (volunteer 9). The change in volunteer 21 was expressed in terms of her doing something - acting': "toured around East Africa for a few weeks, constantly in a different area and situation and meeting various people every day".
The emerging codes from the changes/impacts described under the anxiety trait include: changes in behaviour, emotions, confidence, values, and attitudes; and the emerging themes from the experiences that caused the change/s include: action, responsibility, participation and interaction.
Depression - the levels of depression decreased after the international volunteering experience; the volunteer tourists feel happier and more positive; and have fewer tendencies to feel sad, dejected, or discouraged. Van Willigen (2000) and Frankl (2004), similarly, found that depression decreases as a result of engagement in a meaningful activity, such as, volunteer work. Volunteer 12 retorted: "I am grateful for what I have and now have a sense of duty to help whilst I can" - a behavioural change' that was also accompanied by an attitude change': "I have a lighter outlook on things". Volunteer 15 expressed an emotional change': "volunteering opened my eyes about other peoples' way of life .......I have a sense of accomplishment". She attributed this change to her participation': "the children I cared for suffered many disadvantages but they were generally very positive and dealt with things the best way they could". Volunteer 3 experienced a value change': "I realised that no matter how bad things are you have got to make the most of life and live life to the full". This, she felt, was brought about by her "encounter with people living with HIV and AIDS who were also warm, kind and happy" - a participatory experience'. Attitude change' was also evident in volunteer 11: "I look at the positive side of things now because I realise I have food, clothes and water". She attributed this change to her participating': "seeing people who had nothing which made me feel very humble".
The emerging codes from the changes described under the depression trait were similar to those described under the anxiety trait and include changes in behaviour, emotions, values, and attitudes; and the emerging theme for the volunteer experience was participation.
Assertiveness - The levels of assertiveness significantly increased following the international volunteering experience; the volunteer tourists are likely to speak out more, take charge, and direct the activities of others; and have more of a tendency towards leading. Evidence of this impact is found in Lepp (2008), McGehee and Santos (2005), and Wearing (2001); however, these studies did not identify assertiveness as a specific impact of the volunteer experience.
Volunteer 21 relayed: "By the time I left the children I was quite happy to tell them off if they needed it and to help discipline them" - involvement' with children. Other volunteers associated their experience of increased assertiveness with their experience of taking responsibility': "I try to find solutions to problems" (volunteer 9), "I proved to myself what I am capable of; going to another country by your-self to do something worthwhile" (volunteer 15), and "we had to take charge and responsibility for the children" volunteer 28. Volunteer 28 describes an immersive experience': "they called us mama from the second we walked in. They made us feel so welcome, they needed so much love and care"; and the interaction': "I felt I had to prove to the ladies who worked there that I didn't feel like a better person and that I just wanted to help and after some time we became good friends ......, and they became as fond of us as we of them"; the impact was one of confidence': "I learned so much about taking chances and not to be afraid of doing new things".
The emerging code from the change described under the assertiveness trait is confidence; and the emerging themes, from the experiences are: involvement, taking responsibility, immersion, and interaction.
Emotionality - Emotionality significantly increased as a result of the international volunteering experience; the volunteer tourists have better access to, and awareness of, their own feelings. Again, there is much evidence of this trait in other studies, however, change in emotionality', like assertiveness', was not identified in these studies as a specific impact of the volunteer tourism experience.
The results show that emotionality increased as a result of the international volunteering experience. Volunteer 13 said: "I learned a lot especially respect of other cultures and understanding others' feelings and their individuality" - gaining knowledge or skills'. The same volunteer also felt that the experience was one of cultural immersion' and taking responsibility' for oneself: "living in a different country, with different people and a different language".
Adventurousness - Adventurousness significantly increased as a result of the international volunteering experience; the volunteer tourists are more eager to try new activities, travel to foreign lands, and experience different things and find familiarity and routine boring. Change in this trait was not identified in other volunteer tourism studies as a specific impact of volunteer tourism. This study's volunteers' experienced having increased confidence': "I am not quite as nervous to try new experiences" (volunteer 21); "I feel a sense of achievement and will do more travelling as a woman solo traveller" (volunteer 3). The increased confidence for volunteer 21 was a result of getting involved' in the experience: "not wanting to miss out on experiences you can't do at home such as shark diving and sand boarding and experiencing different cultures". For volunteer 3, the change was a result of taking responsibility': "being placed in a different country for the first time on your own". Volunteer 2 expressed the same sentiment: "travelling on your own to a new country". Other volunteers described experiences involving participation' and immersion': "I took the opportunity to try new things such as white water rafting, and took the opportunity for cultural immersion" (volunteer 2). Volunteer 29 experienced action': "I did my sky dive, climbed mountains, hiked glaciers, did shark cage diving and much more.....oh and had a snake wrapped round my neck...while I was away I very much had the attitude of feel the fear and do it anyway."
The recurring change theme was thus confidence; and the experience themes were involvement, participation, responsibility, immersion and action.
Vulnerability - Vulnerability significantly decreased as a result of the international volunteering experience; the volunteer tourists generally feel more poised, confident, and think more clearly under stress. These findings support Wearing (2001) and Broad (2003) in terms of increased confidence levels. Volunteers noted changes in personal circumstances': "I have since changed jobs" (volunteer 6); changes in confidence': "my confidence has grown dramatically and I take up every single opportunity now" (volunteer 7); and attitude' change: "I am less caught up and worried about small things" (volunteer 10). Volunteer 7 pointed to the responsibility' of "going to another continent without having much contact with home and being far away", and participation' in various projects: "I saw people and children who were much more vulnerable than me"; and "I saw how resilient the children were, they never whined or complained, just got on with things, it made me realise that I am quite a complainer. I also saw the care workers who work so hard for so little money; it made me realise how cushy my life is" (Volunteer 10).
These themes were similar to those identified in other traits: changes in confidence and attitudes as a result of having responsibilities and participation. However, a new emerging code, change to personal circumstances, was also identified. Discussion and conclusions This study identifies seven master categories describing changes in the volunteer tourist, these are: changes in personal circumstances, behaviour, emotions, confidence, values, attitudes, and knowledge or skills. These categories fit well with Broad's (2003), and with the themes identified by Harlow and Pomfret (2007), Lepp (2008), Lough et al (2009), and Zahra and McIntosh (2007). Furthermore, changes in the traits themselves concur with other studies; for example, changes in anxiety, depression, and vulnerability. However, there are some contrasts too. For example, in relation to the altruism trait, Wearing (2001) states that volunteer tourism results in a variety of learning and behavioural changes, such as being less self-centred' (p.134). Similarly, Lough et al (2009) found that ninety percent of their volunteers reported that their experience particularly strengthened their commitment to volunteer service, although they later said it may not significantly affect them' (p. 10). In contrast, this study showed no significant increase in altruism; this may be attributed to the nature of altruism, where people want to present themselves in a more socially desirable way (Albery et al, 2004). Another contrasting finding relates to changes in self-efficacy amongst the volunteer tourists. Both McGehee (2002) and McIntosh and Zahra (2007) reported increases in self-efficacy. However, this study shows that although self-efficacy levels increase, they were not statistically significant. Similarly, for the liberalism trait, the increases were not statistically significant, unlike the findings reported by others (see Seibert and Benson, 2009; Wearing, 2001; Broad, 2003; Harlow and Pomfret, 2007; and Lough et al, 2009). Importantly, the changes in assertiveness, emotionality and adventurousness were all impacts not identified previously in the volunteer tourism literature. The findings from this study also support both Lepp (2008) and Wearing (2001) in highlighting that change in the volunteer tourist is influenced by the experience of interacting with others. However, this study identifies additional aspects of the experience which can contribute to change, such as being active, involved, having responsibilities, participation, and immersion, and whether the experience met the participants' expectations/satisfaction levels. This study has limitations. Personality inventories (e.g. IPIP-NEO), although fulfil the tripartite conception of validity, only capture specific types of data, in this case personality traits, ignoring all those other areas subject to change. Whilst every effort was made to address this limitation by using additional methods, such as, structured personal interviews to identify other changes, the study missed opportunities to receive unexpected but useful information from a less structured inquiry. Furthermore, shortening the original personality inventory has the potential to affect the IPIP-NEO's internal validity and reliability; however, precautions were taken to reduce these effects, such as, ensuring a minimum of four questions per trait and using a matched control group to rule out any extraneous variables that may account for the findings. The selection of the control group involved some snowballing that might have introduced bias in the sample. Furthermore, the control group could only be matched to the volunteer tourists on age, gender and socio-economic variables. By ignoring other variables, such as, culture, intelligence, previous experiences, and family background, the differences between the volunteer tourists and the control group may be attributed to any one or combination of the unmatched variables. A further limitation of this study is the possibility of the findings being temporary, and without further longitudinal studies it is impossible to confirm the permanence of the changes. Longitudinal changes, on the other hand, present their own challenges in terms of ruling out daily life events from such investigations. Although credibility in mixed methods research can arguably be established through triangulation and other similar methods, it must, nevertheless, be ultimately derived from the logic of the study's methodological design - the sample, appropriateness of the measurements used, and the adequacy of the control group. In these respects, the researcher spelt out the approach and left decision trails about the theoretical, methodological and analytical choices made. These findings may benefit South Africa Tourism for marketing volunteer tourism by highlighting its benefits to potential volunteers; they may also inform the European lifelong learning programme which supports youth work and volunteering. ReferencesAlbery, I., Chandler, C., Field, A., Jones, D., Messer, D., Moore, S., and C. Sterling. (2004). Complete Psychology. Dubai: Hodder Arnold.
Broad, S. (2003). "Living the Thai Life - A Case Study of Volunteer Tourism at the Gibbon Rehabilitation Project, Thailand." Tourism Recreational Research, 28 (3): 63-72.
Brown, S. (2005). "Understanding the Motives and Benefits of Voluntourists: What makes them tick?" VolunTourist, October: Accessed 20th May 2008, http://www.voluntourism.org/news-studyand research1005.htm
Cape Town Conference on Responsible Tourism in Destinations (2002). "A Study of the Literature and Current Research into Responsible Tourism and the Sport of Skiing." In Skier Motivation and Destination Choice, edited by V. Tonge. Accessed 10th May 2008, http://www.icrtourism.org/Publications/LiteratureandCurrentResearch.pdf
Clegg, F. (1982). Simple Statistics. Cambridge: University Press.
Clemmons, D. and N. McGehee (2008). "The Transformation Potential of Voluntourism." GWTTRA 2009 Symposium: The Voluntourism Effect: Case Studies and Investigations. California.
Daldeniz, B. (2009). "VOLUNtourists versus volunTOURISTS: a true dichotomy or merely a differing perception? A comparative study of charity-based voluntourism versus lifestyle' voluntourism: cases from Nicaragua and Malaysia." Best Education Network Think Tank - on the importance of values in Sustainable Tourism: First Symposium on volunteering and tourism. Singapore.
Denzin, N. (1989). The Research Act. A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: Englewood Cliffs.
Dex, S. (1991). Life and work history analysis: Qualitative and quantitative developments. London: Routledge.
Feyeraband, P. (1975). Against method. London: New Left Review.
Fielding, N., and J. Fielding. (1986). Linking data. California: Sage.
Flick, U. (1992). "Triangulation revisited: Strategy of validation or alternative?" Journal for the theory of social behaviour, 22: 175-198.
Frankl, V. (2004). Man's search for meaning. New York: Pocket Books.
Gecko, Bradt Travel Guides and Lasso Communications (2009). "Volunteer Travel Insights Report: 2009." USA.
Gudykunst, W. (1998). Bridging Differences: Effective intergroup communication. Newbury: Sage.
Harlow, S. and G. Pomfret (2007). "Evolving Environmental Tourism Experiences in Zambia." Journal of Ecotourism, 6 (3): 184-209.
Hedge, J., Borman, W., and S. Birkeland (2001). "History and development of multisource feedback as a methodology." In The handbook of multisource feedback, edited by D. Bracken, C. Timmreck, and A. Church. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Pp15-32.
Higginson, S. and W. Mansell (2008). "What is the mechanism of psychological change? A qualitative analysis of six individuals who experienced personal change and recovery." Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 81(3): 309-328.
Hill, M., Russell, J., and G. Brewis (2009). "Young people, volunteering and youth projects: A rapid review of recent evidence." Institute of Volunteering Research, UK.
Johnson, J. (2007). Email conversation between the researcher and Professor Johnson on the 17.12.2007.
Lepp, A. (2008). "Discovering Self and Discovering Others Through the Taita Discovery Centre Volunteer Tourism Programme, Kenya." In Journeys of discovery in volunteer tourism: International case study perspectives, edited by K. Lyons, and S. Wearing. London: CABI Publishers. Pp86-100.
Lough, B., Moore McBride, A. and M. Sherraden (2009). "Perceived Effects of International Volunteering: Reports from Alumni." CSD Research Report, 09-10, Centre for Social Development. St. Louis: Washington University.
McGehee, N. (2002). "Alternative Tourism and Social Movements." Annals of Tourism Research, 29 (1): 124-143.
McGehee, N. and C. Santos (2005). "Social change, discourse and volunteer tourism." Annals of Tourism Research, 32 (3): 760-779.
Meek, R. (2007). "The experiences of a young Gypsy-Traveller in the transition from custody to community: An interpretative phenomenological analysis." Legal and Criminal Psychology, 12: 133-147.
Morse, J. (1991). "Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation." Nursing Research, 40 (2): 120-123.
Ong, A., and M. Van Dulmen. (2007). Oxford Handbook of Methods in Positive Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Raymond, E. and C. Hall (2008). "The development of cross-cultural (mis)understanding through volunteer tourism." Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 16 (5): 530-543.
Reid, K., Flowers, P. and M. Larkin (2005) "Exploring lived experience." The Psychologist, 18 (1): Accessed 12th December 2008, http://www.bps.org.uk.
Seibert, N. and A. Benson (2009). "The Motivations of German Volunteers: The case of South Africa." Best Education Network Think Tank - on the importance of values in Sustainable Tourism: First Symposium on volunteering and tourism. Singapore.
Shaw, S. (2001). "Why use interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology?." Health Psychology Update, 10 (4): 48-52.
Simpson, K. (2004). "Doing Development: The gap year, volunteer tourists and popular practice of development." Journal of International Development, 16: 681-92.
Sin, H. (2009). "Volunteer Tourism - Involve me and I will learn'?" Annals of Tourism Research, 36 (3): 480-501.
Smith, J. and M. Osborn (2004). "Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis." In Doing Social Psychology Research, edited by G. Blackwell. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Pp229-254.
Solomon, M. (1996). Consumer Behaviour (3rd Ed). USA: Prentice Hall.
Tomazos, K. and R. Butler (2008). "Volunteer Tourism: Tourism, Serious Leisure, Altruism or Self Enhancement?" CAUTHE 2008 Conference: Where the bloody hell are we? Australia.
Van Willigen, M. (2000). "Differential benefits of volunteering across the life course." Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 55B (5): 308-318.
Wearing, S. (2001). Volunteer Tourism: Experiences That Make a Difference. Oxford: CABI Publishing.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our Common Future. New York: Oxford University Press.
Yoon, Y. and M. Uysal (2005). "An examination of the effects of motivation and satisfaction on destination loyalty: a structural model." Tourism Management, 26: 45-56.
Zahra, A. (2006). "The unexpected road to spirituality via volunteer tourism." Tourism: An Interdisciplinary International Journal, 54 (2):173-185.
Zahra, A and A. McIntosh (2007). "Volunteer tourism: Evidence of
cathartic tourist experiences." Tourism Recreation Research. 32 (1): 115-119.
[1] Professor Johnson wrote descriptions of these traits based on extensive reading of the scientific literature on personality measurement. These descriptions are in the public domain and can be found on the IPIP web-site: http://ipip.ori.org.
[2] Advice sought from Prof. Charles Malcolm, Head of Psychology at the University of the Western Cape, South Africa.
Kevin's Skydive Taylorville Promo
Next page: 93 Year Old + Sky Diving + Arizona
Skydiving In St Louis Area News
Pomp, Diplomas And Words Of Inspiration
29 Jun 2011 at 12:00am Dennis M. Walcott spoke about his own experience in Queens public schools. He described skydiving on his 50th birthday. And he told graduates all over New York City, those fin- ishing fifth, eighth or 12th grade or getting a G.E.D., that he hoped one of them would take his job someday. Mr. Walcott, who became schools chancellor in April, has spoken...Read more...


