Prices Of Skydiving :: About Sky Diving
Prices Of Skydiving

Skydiving on the island of Oahu - CLICK HERE!

Second Freefly Skydiving Over Sebastian John Steele Cody Price #2

14 May 2008 at 12:08am


Tandem Skydive Club Kilkenny

24 Mar 2011 at 8:07am


Niall Coughlan's Tandem Skydive Kilkenny Yahoooo!!

16 Mar 2011 at 3:30pm



Amazon Bestsellers


Free Fall (A sexy skydiving thrill ride)
By: Jasmine Haynes
Price:


Skydiving 101: The Truth About Skydiving For Beginners
By: Jack Weldon
Price:


The Book of Skydiving Formations: 2-ways through 20-ways
By: Mike Truffer
Price:


Skydiving: The Best 60 Seconds of your Life!
By: Andrew King
Price:


No ETA: The Pioneering Days of Skydiving
By: Dick Fortenberry
Price:



Prices Of Skydiving

Empowering Collective Action through Tipping Points

Next steps for swarms of people to make their Point and get their GROUP ON

Group action now has an easy and effective internet application. It has been made available by a business called The Point that was originally concieved to help facilitate social activism. The Point is a business that makes use of a flexible process that effectively manages risk. The Point can be used in various ways. It's first commercial iteration is a group buying company called GROUPON.

Since the advent of civilization, top down hierarchies have been the general rule and not the exception. Brutal dictators, monarchies, oligarchies, political philosophers, management theorists, CEO's and even Wall Street tycoons have all recognized this as inevitable, as sure as the law of the jungle where the Lion rules as a solitary king.

But to start with, this misplaced metaphor is a piece of fiction. Lions don't live in the jungle. They roam sparsely treed plains in the countryside. And it is not the Lion but swarms of Driver Ants, up to 50 million strong that are the true kings of the jungle. When they move they do so all at once, marching together, devouring everything in their way.

What if humans could swarm? What then?

The Point

In 2007, an Internet application called The Point was created to better facilitate social change. This invention was seen by many as the next evolution in social networking. The business by the same name, The Point is founded by Andrew Mason, a Northwestern graduate who passed on graduate school at the University of Chicago to start this new venture. The move paid quick dividends in January of 2008, when The Point successfully raised $4.8 million from top tier venture capital firm New Enterprises Associates - quite a grab given the current tepid venture capital investing environment.

New Enterprise Associates has some very smart people with a long track record of making successful bets. They grasped the big idea contained in The Point: a belief that the Internet could shift the balance of power from institutions to individuals.

What The Point does is reduce the social costs of organizing by lowering the risks associated with participation - particularly early stage participation that is historically fraught with failure and risk. The Point changes this by putting first movers and early entrants on equal footing with the majority of us that typically will only take up a cause after it has a reasonable chance of winning. For a fundraiser, this means this means my funds are not committed until a specified goal has been reached. For a boycott or petition, it means I don't have to take action until a specific threshold has been met that is significant enough for the project to be successful.

The Point methodology borrows from a concept known, not coincidentally, as the Tipping Point. Depending on the mode of science, this can mean related but somewhat different things. In physics, it denotes a change in equilibrium. In climatology, it is a point in when change becomes irreversible. In sociology, it is the moment when something unique becomes common. [1]

Thanks to Malcolm Gladwell, author of the bestseller of the same name, The Tipping Point, it is from sociology that a broader and more popular concept has emerged. "Tipping Points are levels at which the momentum of change becomes unstoppable." [2]

The Point's credo is to make something happen. To achieve this they created an Internet application which allows you to post a project that requires specific goals to be set in order to succeed. Those goals are typically set as a specific number of participants (as in a boycott), or a certain amount of money (as in a fundraiser). Serious stuff, no doubt. But The Point can be used in a number of curious and fun ways that have nothing to do with politics and institutions, like planning a party. After all, who wants to go to all the trouble and expense of throwing a party if only three people are going to show up?

GROUPON

It turned out the most popular collective action so far has turned out to be - take a guess - saving money. The Point discovered this when it created GROUPON, a business that secures massive discounts from businesses. Salespersons call on restaurants, bars, health clubs, spas, dentists and everything in between. If GROUPON sounds like coupon, it is no accident. GROUPON has successfully re-invented the coupon. Except their clients are not typical coupon clippers and their deals are not typically offered at a discount. GROUPON's success lies in its ability to offer extreme discounts (typically 50% or more) not normally available on fun things to do and great places to eat and drink.

For businesses, unlike coupons that offer secure discounts and make no promises, GROUPON's Tipping Point process guarantees a certain number of people will buy as a result. The formula is simple, elegant, and clear: the discounted price of a product or service is guaranteed when "x" number of units is sold. "X" being the tipping point. When the project is "Tipped" you get a coupon to use within a specified time, creating a superior method to Tuangou, the Chinese swarm shopping trend whereby hundreds of customers often show up all at once at a storefront to negotiate discounts with the store owner or manager.

Already GROUPON has been a smashing success, operating in 13 major cities and delivering over 15 million dollars in savings to date for clients that range from hair salons, movie theaters, health clubs, and burger restaurants and even include psychics and acupuncturists. In a recent Chicago offering, with the creative help of Internet Troubadour Jonathon Mann, GROUPON sold 1, 668 skydiving jumps at $130.00 each, totaling $216, 840 of revenue in a single day. Since GROUPON earns commissions on sales, their take here was likely substantial. GROUPON is based in Chicago and businesses there are smitten with the idea. In a recent Fox News Interview, Andrew Mason reported a 120 day business backlog to advertise Chicago deals. But what is more important, GROUPON has achieved what Web 1.0 group buy companies Mercata and MobShop could not, turn a profit. They do so by focusing on one deal a day from local service providers and delivering steeper discounts than the electronics oriented group buy etailers of old.

But while GROUPON has demonstrated quick success, deep pockets and first mover advantage, they possess no propriety technology or process that traditional technology company's valuation and market position has rested upon. Already there are GROUPON clones popping up, such as BuyWithMe, whose website, offering, and strategy is remarkably similar. And it remains to be seen if larger internet properties - Ebay, Yahoo, Amazon, MSN - will want to partner with Group On or one of its competitors. Or, when the market proves big enough, perhaps an Ebay or Yahoo may offer a similar service themselves. Whatever happens, GROUPON has clearly gained traction in a new space that has an enormous amount of room to grow.

New Vistas

As cool and exciting as saving $99.00 for the adrenaline rush of taking your first jump from 14, 000 feet, it is no comparison for the experience to be felt from the depth of the structural changes that are likely to follow. Historically, contemporary capitalism rested upon separation and isolation; that is, the separation of production from consumption and isolation of buyers from one another to create an atmosphere of competition. These tendencies were exacerbated by a media that operated one way, molding business processes and organizational hierarchies to seemingly immutable laws.

In this environment, information flowed from top to bottom and it was oftentimes producers rather than consumers that tended to collaborate, giving rise to rounds of consumer protectionism, first from industrial robber barons and later from mega corporations.

Web 1.0 caused a massive decrease in the cost of information but did not alter its flow. Business processes, like the tactics of social activists, were imported from the offline world online, without changing strategy.

However Web 2.0 (the read-write web) promises again to change everything. Information no longer flows one way. We can Twitter a message that instantly ends up on CNN to be seen all over the world. Or author an article as a Google Knol like this one and distribute to search engines and RSS feeds to be potentially viewed everywhere there are internet connections. We can post a video on You Tube on about just about anything. With a little effort, we can have hundreds of new friends keep up with on My Space, Bebo, or Facebook. In short, for the first time we can all be seen and heard.

But can we be directed toward anything meaningful?

To date, the Tipping Point methodology expressed by The Point represents the best approach towards organizing masses of men and women toward some meaningful goal and is the best application towards communicating goals that direct humans to act all at once, as if a swarm.

The Point is not to announce to the world what I am doing, but to make something happen. I believe GROUPON is merely the first iteration of The Point's application in commerce. Tipping Point methodology has numerous implications for new business formation, real estate sales and development, and even the purchase and control of existing corporations.

New Business Formation

Much that can be said about the risks of social activism we can say of the risk of new business formation. From the standpoint of risk, the Social Activist and Entrepreneur are a lot alike; in fact, one could say they are next of kin.

The Point has demonstrated that more risk adverse social actions can take place by setting and reaching Tipping Points, prior to individual activists having to take action. The same results, I believe, can be achieved on behalf of (and sometimes in place of) the Entrepreneur.

For example, if I wanted to start a new business (particularly a small business not capable of qualifying for a loan that offered something new or original), I would first have to put my own time and money at work, set up shop and begin to attract customers. In time I would find out if there was enough demand for my product or service.

Today, using Tipping Point methodology, I could first see if I could get some specified number customers to buy my product or service at a specified price - a price that by my own or others (analysts, investors) projections I would need to make my business viable. When this tipping point is reached, I could then open my doors for business, reversing the order of things, creating a whole new path of dependency (literally standing the conventional tract of new business formation on its head).

The Coffee Shop

Let's say you love coffee and wanted a Starbucks on an empty corner of a strip center near your residence. You could write Starbucks a letter, telling them of your interest and wait patiently for them to respond. Or, you could post your idea on the The Point and with a target of, say, 500 serious coffee drinkers like yourself, willing to step up and commit to buying a cup of four dollar coffee three times per week. Now that might even get Starbucks attention.

But what if you wanted a coffee shop close by but cared little for Starbucks. You might approach a local coffee shop owner or another branded coffee shop chain to see what sort commitment you would need from potential customers for them to open a business near you. But in return for financial commitments by potential customers that are triggered only if the shop opens, you would want to secure discounts. Even more, for yourself, who knows, as the organizer of such a project, you might even secure an ownership interest or at least some free coffee, should the tipping point be reached and the nearby coffeeshop become a reality.

Innovation: The Solar Powered Hovercraft

With regard to new product innovation, let's say I have a solar powered hovercraft design that I want to market, but I lack the funds to build it and my prototype needs some further investment (see pictured to the lower right). My banker and some venture capitalists are interested, but they need proof that there is a market for my vehicle before they will loan or invest any money.

Here The Point could be employed to test demand for the vehicle. If I could build it, how many people would buy it at a specified price? How many commitments would I need to break even or make a profit? My Tipping Point might be the number of vehicles needed to be pre-sold to secure financing from a bank or through venture capital. This is how pre-construction condos are sold, from plans and specs and a promise to build. Why not solar powered hovercrafts?

The Point, applied to commerce, holds the promise to revolutionize existing business practices and spur new business formation by reducing execution risk, lowering the cost of capital.

The X Prize

The popular X Prize and has similar methodology as The Point. Money in the form of prize is awarded when a certain objective is achieved. In the case of the X Prize, a goal was reached when a private venture achieved space flight on October 4, 2004.

"An X PRIZE is a $10 million+ award given to the first team to achieve a specific goal, set by the X PRIZE Foundation, which has the potential to benefit humanity. Rather than awarding money to honor past achievements or directly funding research, an X PRIZE incites innovation by tapping into our competitive and entrepreneurial spirits.

The X PRIZE Foundation began a revolution in private spaceflight with the $10 million Ansari X PRIZE. On October 4, 2004, the Mojave Aerospace Ventures team, led by famed aircraft designer Burt Rutan and financed by Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen, captured the Ansari X PRIZE.

The Ansari X PRIZE was modeled after the $25, 000 Orteig Prize, offered in 1919 by wealthy hotelier Raymond Orteig, to the first pilot who could fly non-stop between New York and Paris. The prize was finally won in 1927 by an unknown airmail pilot named Charles Lindbergh. Lindbergh won the hearts of a nation, and his world-changing achievement spawned a $300 billion aviation industry." [3] While prizes offer powerful incentives for action, they come at a cost to the losers. The Point's collaborative process is less costly than other means. Failures are virtual. Time, money, and energy are expended only if the goal is reached online.

The Tipping Point for Timeshares and Fractionals

My own path toward the appropriation of Tipping Point methodology started about two and half years ago when I began researching fractional interest vacation homes. Fractionals, like Timeshares, suffered from high sales and marketing costs and egregious mark ups over product costs (sales and marketing typically represent over 40% of consumer costs for Timeshares with final costs reaching two and one half actual product costs). [4]

It seemed unusual to me was that if six or eight people went in together to buy a suitable vacation home and approached an expert attorney and fractionalized it, they could avoid the mark up costs (as high as 75%) charged by fractional interest promoters and developers. Aside from the force of habit in how we buy things, what was keeping six or eight people from banding together to save money?

A solution appeared simple enough. One merely had to aggregate commitments to buy until there were enough to produce a complete sale. There was some complexity to the transaction, but the enormous amount of savings would provide plenty of motivation to work through the details. So I founded a firm that offered a more cost effective way to structure and close fractional real estate transactions and built a website @ www.fractionalmarkets.com.

But another issue quickly came into focus. To be successful at this time, there was a need to reduce competition from other offerings and concentrate efforts on a single asset over a limited amount of time. There was the need for a new type of auction.

Traditional auctions rested on competition from buyers that act in isolation. A new auction, I gathered, could be created when buyers collaborated to combine their purchasing power to own items that were typically beyond their reach and often impractical as sole owners (Luxury Vacation Homes, Aircraft, Yachts, etc.) or were oftentimes beyond their control (Sports Teams, Businesses, Commercial Real Estate). Here the Tipping Point would occur when enough fractional shares were reserved to complete the sale.

Targets were all or nothing. So it was group buying with a twist; a contingency, based on achieving a specified goal, a complete sale.

So if you were GROUPON, why not target a timeshare operator with a massive group buy to secure equally massive discounts? Or buy a boutique hotel on the beach and convert to fractional and turn over management to a reputable operator?

In time perhaps they will, or someday somebody will. Historically, marketing costs having been simply too high to make them attractive investments. But they remain attractive to buyers for other reasons, as alternatives to expensive hotels and the costs of whole ownership.

Single Family Homes

About the same time I was studying fractional ownership I began reading everybody I could find that had something serious to say about our consumer society and and the structures we build for ourselves to interact and live in - from Canetti to Kunstler, to Baudrillard, Duany and Plater-Zyberk and Mumford. I began to wonder why buyers competed with each other over builder inventory that was nearly identical. If two buyers were looking at the same tract home, a bidding war often ensued with the sales person largely in control of the process. To me it was clear that the builder price model remained trapped in a signal mode of operation with everyone stuck paying retail in a world of monotony and sameness. It struck me that if you were going to buy a house that looked just like your neighbor, why couldn't you go in together and get a price break for two, just like any other business. And where was a business out there that could help others, maybe 10, 12 or even 100 buyers pool their purchase as a group?

I found cooperation in ideological organizations called Intentional Communities and specific housing configurations known as Co-Housing. Both forms of ownership emphasized connectedness and community and possessed elements of group buying. But they lacked the broader of the appeal of the largest groups of all: those of us that simply want to save money.

Currently, the privilege of paying wholesale for the biggest purchase you will ever make has remained beyond the reach of consumers. This to me is troubling when considering that we put a man on the moon 40 years ago and but cannot create a wholesale model for housing.

Sure, there are cultural forces to overcome (largely the separation and isolation thing). Nevertheless, it seems easy enough: Arrive at a discounted price for the purchase of a specific condo project or tract home community of near identical homes (not hard to find) and arrive at a discounted price to buy, provided "x" number of units are sold.

For Single Family Condos or Tract Homes it is a matter of aggregating the necessary buyers to reaching a Tipping Point, the purchase of an entire subdivision (small or large) or project at a potentially massive discount. Discounts passed to buyers and a secondary market is formed for buyers to exchange units prior to close. Just be sure to pre-approve all buyers with proofed funds and loan commitments. And take plenty of back up contracts.

Or, build the national reach and monster user base of a company like GROUPON and then approach a national builder like KB, Lennar or even Toll Brothers for a discount based a specific number of sales.

(see link to article, An Alternative Approach to Buying a Home or Investing in Real Estate).

Sports Teams and Corporations

Ever thought of buying a sports team? Chances are you couldn't afford it. But in England, former football journalist Will Brooks created a working man's version of sports team ownership when he engineered the first group buy of a sports team, calling it MyFootballClub.com. Brooks initially estimated MyFC's purchase fund at 1, 375, 000 if 50, 000 people were to sign up as members. So with 50, 000 members at approximately $50.00 a piece, Brooks created a Tipping Point. The watershed figure of 50, 000 registrations expressing interest in participation was passed on July 31, 2007, with a total of 53, 051 registrations completed at that time. At that point, MyFC began collecting payments from those who had registered as well as any new people who signed up subsequently, opening what MyFootballClub described as "phase 2" Paid-up members would participate in a non-binding vote on takeover preference. All members have an equal share in the club purchased by MyFC and they will collectively manage that club, by making many of the decisions usually made by the manager and others, through a voting system on the MyFootballClub website. [5] The success of MyFootballClub created a wave of similar projects around the world, focusing primarily on soccer teams. With fans increasingly marginalized by high ticket prices going largely to support lavish salaries of athletes, ownership and control of teams is increasingly an attractive way to keep fans involved and interested. In some cases, after hearing about MyFootballClub, floundering organizations have put themselves up for sale for member groups to buy. Ebbsfleet United was one of those and eventually become the team purchased by Brook's buying group.
* for a better view, click on the article above

MyFootballClub has set a model for what could be the takeover of existing corporations by member owners, changing the effective control of even major corporations. Imagine businesses and eventually large corporations purchased and managed in a similar fashion. Keep in mind there numerous public corporations (such as regional and commuter airlines) that are as inexpensive right now as California beachfront mansions. Houston based Express Jet (XJT) operates 214 planes and flies 151 destinations while commanding a market cap of only $39 million dollars.

Perhaps member owned airlines, grocery stores, chain restaurants, spas and health clubs could be in the offering at some point. In any event, the read-write web has changed the ground rules for exchange. But it is up to individuals to change their battle tactics. What The Point and GROUPON prove is that going at it alone doesn't make as much sense anymore.

Related Articles by Author

GREENMAIL: A New Approach to Ethical Investment Group Buying: Power in Numbers Group Buying Direct: Beating the Brands


Does the price of Skydiving at Grove City Airport in Pennsylvania go down if you get a group of people?
It's around $300.00 if you go alone.

Get the answers...

Tandem Skydiving over South Africa

31 Jul 2009 at 8:30am



Next page: Prices On Skydiving


Prices Of Skydiving News


Skydiver aims to go faster than speed of sound - New York Daily News

7 Feb 2012 at 11:44pm 

New York Daily News

Skydiver aims to go faster than speed of sound
New York Daily News
By David Boroff / NEW YORK DAILY NEWS Bernhard Spoettel/Euro-Newsroom/via AP Austrian skydiver Felix Baumgartner aims to become the first person to go faster than the speed of sound when he jumps from a balloon at 120000 feet later this year.
Austrian skydiver prepares to jump from edge of spaceVancouver Sun
Skydiving from SpacePhysicsCentral.com (blog)
Recommended: World's biggest jump reset for 2012msnbc.com
GlobalPost (blog) -Fox News -Newser
all 86 news articles »


Read more...


Students reach new heights in Skydiving Club - Iowa State Daily

7 Feb 2012 at 8:50pm 

Students reach new heights in Skydiving Club
Iowa State Daily
There really isn't anything like that moment before a skydiver makes the jump. That twinge of fear, the rush of adrenaline ? it's enough to make you pull back. But the Skydiving Club at Iowa State will push you to reach new limits.



Read more...


Brighton grad strikes skydiving gold (with photos) - Livingston Daily

7 Feb 2012 at 11:30am 

Brighton grad strikes skydiving gold (with photos)
Livingston Daily
2009 Brighton High School graduate Erin Brown, center, grabs hold of one of her teammates on the US Air Force Academy competitive skydiving team while two others grab onto her legs. The team tries to create a formation as fast as possible after jumping ...

and more »


Read more...